Social support: the Predictor of Self-Esteem and Post-Traumatic Growth


Author: Ushna Nawaz

Social support is described as the effort which advances the aims of the receiver of support (Caplan, 1979). Support from the main group that cares for health through the duration of stress (Cassel, 1976). Social support is support from related and respected people. Emotive support, influential support, informational support, and consideration are involved in it (Gottlieb, 1985).
Social support is not only helping to deal with challenges or to make us feel better but also helps us to enriched health which involves physical fitness, psychological condition, and overall well-being. Thus social support stays significant for a good life. Mostly health results such as mental modification, enhanced effectiveness, using improved coping strategy when facing offensive situations, fighting with illness, retrieval after illness, and decline humanity are related to social support.
Social support has a significant association with self-esteem; hence, it also has an impact on the post-traumatic growth of an individual. Bhatt (2017) examined the association between social support and self-esteem. In this research seventy-five participants were selected for data collection. The result indicated a positive correlation among all dimensions of social support and self-esteem. The conclusion of the study validates that social support impacts self-esteem.
A person’s assessment of his value is termed as self-esteem. It includes opinions related to one-self (as an example, “I am capable”, “I am prestigious”) also the emotive condition like achievement, hopelessness, superiority, and dignity. It was described by Smith and Mackie (2007) as, the self-concept is something individuals reflect about oneself, any optimistic or negative assessment of oneself, like in what way individuals feel (Lilian, Odundo, Kahiga, Muriuki, Muriithi & Koring’ura, 2016). 
Self-esteem refers as an enchanting psychological concept as it assumes definite consequences, as an example educational success (Marsh, 1990) pleasure, (Baumeister, Campbell, Krueger & Vohs, 2003) gratification in wedding and affiliations, and lawless acts (Bleidorn, Schonbrodt, Gebauer, Rentfrow, Potter & Gosling, 2016).
Self-esteem could be implied to a particular trait (as an illustration, “I trust I am capable of writing and I am joyful about it”) or universally (as an example, “I trust I have bad characteristics, and I feel poor about it generally”). Self-esteem in the viewpoint of a psychologist describes as a persistent personality attribute that is trait self-esteem, though usual, variations for short time i.e. state self-esteem, also present.  Self-worth, self-regard, self-respect, and self-integrity are the other near meanings of self-esteem (James, 1892).
Sociological models of self-esteem believe that social factors influence self-esteem; the concept is centered on Cooley’s (1902) prototype of the “looking-glass self” and in Mead’s (1934) point of view “making perception and generalize others”. The individual will have high self-esteem if he thinks that he is greatly considered and respected by society at larger. In this way, demographic variables like “professional status, salary, schooling, and societal prestige have an impact on self-esteem.
If a person is getting social support it will enhance its self-esteem. The enriched self-esteem aids to cope with issues and stress, hence, elevate the post-traumatic growth.  Post-traumatic growth can be defined as the personal practice of optimistic variations stated by a person as a consequence of fight with trauma. As examples of optimistic intellectual variations enhance gratitude of life, set novel life preferences, promoting a sense of subjective strength, categorizing novel opportunities, warm relationships, or encouraging spiritual fluctuations (Tedeschi, Calhoun & Park, 1998).
Growth after trauma or advantage finding is encouraging mental change which is practiced as a consequence of hardship and other confronts for increasing higher performance (Tedeshi & Calhoun, 2004).  These different situations manifest challenges to adaptive resources and ways of the individuals to understand the world, and also understand where they lie in the world.
Post-traumatic growth is not about gaining the same level of psychological conditions as experienced before traumatic event recurring to the similar life like it was formerly practiced before a period of shocking pain; however, to a certain extent, it is thought that major 'life-changing' mental move concerning to the earth are responsible for personal change, which is considered as meaningful (Tedeshi & Calhoun, 2004).
Positive changes are experienced by individuals after facing traumatic experiences. They also say positive psychological changes as post-traumatic growth which is experienced as a struggle in the highly challenging life situation (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004). Three main domains have appeared in post-traumatic growth such as variations in “self-perception”, variations in “relationship with others” in addition to variations in “philosophy of life” (Stanton et al., 2006).
Social support is a type of environmental resource, in the conceptual model of Schaefer and Moos ‟it is suggested afterlife traumas and transition, PTG is recognized. In positively understanding the life crisis, social support has great importance (Schaefer & Moos, 1998).
Social support is information that leads the individuals of having a belief of being cared for, loved, respected, encouraged which relate to the system of contact and mutual responsibility. The social support controls the effects of major transitions and unpredictable crisis in life and thus leads to adjustment to change. In other terminology, social support regulates the connection between an individual and a traumatic event. Breast cancer is a traumatic experience as discussed earlier, it is understood that social support moderates the relationship among the women confronting the breast cancer diagnosis and their poor health or disease experience. Therefore, social support is validated to help evaluate the diagnosis of illness and adjust with their illness in an optimistic way may. For that reason, this is presented as social support is in direct relationship with PTG (Cobb, 1976). Social support is correlated through the growth of PTG in breast cancer patients going through procedures of surgery (Bozo & colleagues, 2009).
Several studies were conducted to approve the association between social support, self-esteem, and post-traumatic growth. Nisa and Rizvi (2016) directed research to define the link between coping strategies, social support, and post-traumatic growth. One hundred and seventy-six participants were selected for data collection. It provides that post-traumatic growth is highly influenced by coping strategies and social support.
Hoffman, Ushpiz, and Levy-Shiff, in 1988 explained the relationship between social support and self-esteem. They stated that social support and self-esteem are strongly bonded and social support has a high influence on self-esteem. When people get more social support they also exhibit a high level of self-esteem, social support improves self-esteem. And low self-esteem is associated with a decrease in post-traumatic while high self-esteem is related to enhanced post-traumatic growth (Calhoun and Tedeschi 2014).
     Our small acts can bring great change. As now we know that by providing social support we can help each other, so, we should do acts that can provide comfort and encouragement to people.

Comments